![]() The ladder tipped and damaged the studio equipment and a lawsuit was filed against the photographer.Many mistakenly believe that their homeowner's insurance policy will have them covered, but that's not always the case. A recent claim example includes a young child who was posed on a ladder. If you’re a photographer who rents studio space to capture a specific look for your client, you run the risk of damaging property that is not your own. What if one of their children got too close to the bank and fell in the river while you were taking their picture? Furthermore, what if they sustained a broken arm as the result and a suit was filed against you? Damage to Studio Property or an Offsite Location ![]() For example, a family might be interested in taking a photo near a river in the woods. Injury Obtained During an Offsite Photoshoot.įamily photos that are taken at picture-perfect locations can lead to injuries. A suit could be filed against you for directing them to move in such a way. What if someone injured themselves while you were directing their pose? Let’s say, a client follows your instruction and they end up injuring their arm. Photographers often ask clients to pose or move a certain way to capture a great shot. Risks Photographers Face Injury Obtained During the Photoshoot I asked Insurance Canopy to give me an overview of the sort of problems that can occur that insurance will help, or even save you from. In fact, you could argue that those are the kindest risks. However, the risks photographers face run further and deeper than those. It's rare that anything substantial goes wrong on a shoot, and when we think of insurance we usually consider dropping a lens, or a light falling over. Make of that story what you will, but some Googling can quickly reveal horror stories. What's worse, the photographer was uninsured. They weren't keen to divulge any more details, but from the sounds of it, the number of zeros in the quotation to fix everything was several more than any photographer is going to have lying around. Somebody tripped over an unsecured wire, and not only got hurt, but damaged the property. I printed them out and brought them with me, but I had to ask: why were they so worked up? Well, some years prior a photographer shot an event at this old and ornate property. A week of the shoot, but before I arrived they called me in a bit of a panic they needed to see my insurance documents. These lenses were born to shoot wide open, and they really shine on full frame cameras.A few years ago I had a shoot arranged at a beautiful and listed manor house in England that was both structurally borderline invaluable, but furnished with high-end, antique artifacts and art works. And of course, they now have the quality and reliability of TLS housings, which feature 110mm fronts, uniform position of focus and iris gears, 330 degree focus throw with zero image shift, and zero backlash.Īs for the look of the lenses: they perform well wide open, sharp but not clinical, low contrast, some barrel distortion on the wider lenses, beautiful pronounced flares, and soft pleasing bokeh. TLS replaced the original irises with matte finished 16-blade irises, and they greatly improved close focus on every focal length. In the camera system the lenses were originally designed for, the iris control ring is built into the camera body rather than the lens, making it impossible to Cine-Mod them, or to use adapters for other camera mounts.īecause of this unique camera system, the lenses fell into obscurity, and the only way to use these lenses on modern cameras is a full rehouse. Not to be confused with Kowa Cine Prominar primes, these are Full Frame still photo lenses from the 1960s-1970s made for Kowa leaf shutter SLR cameras. These are unique, vintage Kowa Full Frame lenses, beautifully rehoused by TLS.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |